You can find the whole thing here. It’s quarterly, not monthly.
In other news, I’ve been noticing a trend among old guard libertarians in the US: they ignore arguments they don’t understand, and they actively seek to purge or discredit arguments they don’t like. By “old guard” I mean the ones way older than Tyler Cowen and his elite grad school gang at GMU.
Cowen has done a great service to libertarianism, and the effects of his work — which basically rescued libertarianism from obscurity and dogmatism - will be felt for one hundred years. I hope more and more people come to recognize this fact.
The old guard is particularly cruel in regards to foreign policy debates, which inevitably revolve around the United States. Europeans are especially excluded from the debate, but so too is anybody who doesn’t share a simple-minded, hammer-first approach to “non-interventionism” (which is a stupid term to begin with). By hammer-first I mean that the old guard simply treats every interpolity problem around the world with a non-interventionist slogan and a denouncement of “American imperialism.” Hayek and Mises didn’t do this. Present-day Europeans, Africans, Latin Americans, and Asians don’t do this. Why do North American libertarians continue to do this? I have a working paper that answers this question. I’ll share it when it finally gets through a (rightfully) brutal gatekeeping process.
Oh, by the way, that new magazine I mentioned above was founded by me. Michalis did a ton of thankless work behind the scenes. I hope you like and that you’ll subscribe (for free).